Sample Report

This is what you get for every client

A real Chemistry Report structure with sample data: Margaret Chen, a Guardian client, paired with a Commander advisor.

Sample data. This report uses a fictional client so you can see the exact structure and depth every Chemistry Report delivers.

Advisor Playbook · Confidential

4A

Adaptation Priorities

paceGap: 6.0 pts

You decide in the room; they need to decide in advance.

Do this

Send a written pre-meeting brief 48 hours before every review. Lead with your recommendation upfront, then provide supporting data. Never ask for a decision on something they're seeing for the first time.

Avoid this

Don't walk into a meeting with a new recommendation and expect an answer on the spot. Don't treat silence as hesitation, it's processing.

signalGap: 5.0 pts

Formal structure is how this client experiences professionalism.

Do this

Schedule a fixed quarterly review date at the start of the year. Send a structured agenda 3 days before every meeting. Follow up in writing within 24 hours of any meeting with a decision or action item.

Avoid this

Don't send a quick text about something important. Don't cancel or reschedule without significant notice and a formal explanation.

lensGap: 6.0 pts

They trust the data, not the summary.

Do this

Always provide the full report, not just the one-pager. Cite your sources and show your assumptions. Walk them through the methodology at least once, after that, they'll trust your process.

Avoid this

Don't round numbers. Don't say 'trust me on this one.' Don't skip the data and lead with the conclusion.

4B

Communication Playbook

Meeting format

Structured, scheduled quarterly reviews with a written agenda sent 3 days in advance. Supplemented by brief written updates (not calls) for portfolio changes. Meeting duration: 60 minutes, not 30.

Communication channel

Email is the primary channel. Use it for everything substantive. Reserve calls for time-sensitive decisions only. Never use text for anything financial.

Cadence

Quarterly formal reviews (fixed dates set at year-start). Monthly written portfolio summary by email. Ad-hoc email for any change to strategy, allocation, or fees, never surprise them.

Delivering bad news

Send a brief email first: 'I want to walk you through something on our call Thursday.' Give them time to mentally prepare. On the call, lead with facts before context, acknowledge the impact directly, then present the plan. Follow up in writing.

Presenting recommendations

Send the full analysis before the meeting. Present the recommendation at the top of the meeting, then walk through the supporting data. Explicitly invite questions about methodology and assumptions, this is how they validate trust.

Red flags: signs of disengagement

  • They start asking basic questions they've asked before, a sign they no longer trust that information is coming proactively.
  • Response time to emails increases from hours to days without explanation.
  • They begin asking for a second opinion or referencing what 'other advisors' do.
4C

Pre-Meeting Checklist

Review these 10 minutes before every meeting with this client.

Client Profile

The Guardian

Ned Stark · Captain America · Dwight Eisenhower · Cal Ripken Jr. · Gandalf

You are a steady, thorough professional who builds trust through consistency and competence. Before making any financial decision, you want to understand it fully, not just the recommendation, but the reasoning, the data, and the alternatives. You've chosen an advisor you trust implicitly, and that trust is grounded in their track record and reliability. When they follow through, every time, you feel secure. When things change without explanation, you notice.

PACEDeliberate → Decisive
2.5/10
LENSBig Picture → Detail-First
8.5/10
ANCHORResults-Anchored → Relationship-Anchored
8.0/10
HELMGuide Me → I'll Drive
2.5/10
CURRENTSteady → Adaptive
2.0/10
SIGNALFormal → Casual
2.5/10

Working Dynamic

How You Two Work Best Together

The most significant dynamic in this pairing is the gap between pace and detail preference. You process decisions deliberately and want comprehensive information before committing; your advisor moves quickly and leads with the headline. This isn't a conflict, it's a communication calibration opportunity. When your advisor learns to send the supporting detail before the meeting rather than presenting a recommendation cold, your trust in their process will deepen significantly. The second gap is in communication style: you prefer structured, scheduled interactions while your advisor defaults to informal and ad-hoc. A consistent cadence of formal touchpoints will make you feel valued and well-served.

Top Adaptation Areas

pace
Client: 2.5Advisor: 8.5Gap: 6.0
lens
Client: 8.5Advisor: 2.5Gap: 6.0

Get this for your own clients

Every client relationship gets its own Chemistry Report, generated from your profile and theirs.

Start free trial

14-day free trial · No credit card required